SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Expressions & POVs
Better Manageability and Operational Efficiency Through Saner’s Multi-Tenant Architecture

Better Manageability and Operational Efficiency Through Saner’s Multi-Tenant Architecture

Multi-tenant architecture refers to the mode of operation wherein a single instance of a software application attends to multiple tenants. Each client is called a tenant. They may represent enterprises that gained access to the multi-tenant application or the multiple applications competing for intr...

Mar 8, 2016By Rini3 min read

Multi-tenant architecture refers to the mode of operation wherein a single instance of a software application attends to multiple tenants. Each client is called a tenant. They may represent enterprises that gained access to the multi-tenant application or the multiple applications competing for intrinsic resources. Tenants are permitted to customize certain parts of the application such as business rules, workflow, user interface etc. but they cannot customize the application code. Logically the tenants isolated but physically they are integrated. Using a vulnerability management solution can come under better manageability.

Tenancy can be either single or multi. In a single tenancy architecture, each customer has their own software instance and may be provided access to code and the provider has to touch multiple instances of the software in order to make updates whereas in a multi-tenant architecture update has to be made by the provider only once. But the meaning of multi-tenancy architecture widened when it comes to cloud-computing. A provider of Saas can run one instance of its application on one instance of a database and deliver web access to multiple customers. In this case, each tenant’s data is remote and cannot viewed by other tenants. While some clouds use architectures based on virtualization to segregate tenants while others use custom software architectures for this purpose. More customers supported on fewer nodes, and fewer nodes mean reduced cost and more efficiency. However, a patch management solution is also important.

Key requirements to keep multi-tenancy safe:

The resources allocated to one tenant must not be known to other tenants and they shouldn’t have access to each other’s resources.

Role-based security is important. An overall administrator will have knowledge of the resources which are setup and also deployed. But that doesn’t give permission to the overall administrator to execute functions associated with single-tenant environments.

In a multi-tenant environment, the tenant administrator is able to allocate the management and access capabilities to suitable administrators within the tenant. Tenant administration must be role based.

Why is multi-tenancy important?

The rising popularity of cloud computing and virtualization has made the importance of multi-tenancy in today’s IT world quite crucial. Multi-tenancy is turning out to be a pre-requisite for many organizational deployments to avoid sharing resources among multiple groups.

Saner’s multi-tenant architecture

Architected for speed and scalability, Saner supports a multi-tenant architecture and a large number of endpoints without having to rely on a hierarchical server infrastructure. Based on a scalable BigData architecture, thousands of devices easily supported by a sole server without degradation in performance. A single server can manage multiple customer’s or business unit’s endpoint data, each compartmentalized neatly with different access rights. Multiple segments of a corporate network managed by different users. Multiple managed accounts created with different accesses based on their role.

Saner’s multi-tenant architecture offers services which:

  • are totally safe and shielded from any influence by other tenants.
  • allows maximum sharing of resources across tenants but at the same time is able to differentiate data belonging to other clients.
  • allows tenants to use the same building blocks but the workflow or appearance of the application may be diverse for different tenants.

Without multi-tenancy, the benefits such as flexibility, ability to scale and adaptability and cost-efficiency reduces. Duplicate infrastructure or instances required and complexity of the setting is greater than before.

  • Rini Thomas

Featured Posts

Open The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective
The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

Point of View

The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

No single named standard makes a vulnerability assessment framework effective. This piece covers NIST, ISO, and CIS Controls, then breaks down what actually separates a working framework from a checklist, coverage, risk based prioritization, cadence, ownership, and a feedback loop.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated
Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

Point of View

Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

A vulnerability alone doesn't tell the whole risk story. This piece breaks down how a threat and vulnerability assessment pairs technical weaknesses with real attacker context, walks through the six step process, and covers frameworks like NIST 800-30 and ISO 27005.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For
Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Point of View

Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Choosing a vulnerability assessment provider means asking about actual coverage, scan frequency, and whether findings come with real prioritization or just a CVSS dump. This piece breaks down what strong vulnerability assessment services include, red flags to avoid, and questions to ask before signing.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not
Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Point of View

Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Agentic AI is expanding what a vulnerability assessment needs to cover, autonomous agents bring their own credentials, tool access, and memory, adding a genuinely new asset class alongside servers and endpoints. It's also compressing attacker timelines and introducing risk categories like goal hijacking and tool misuse that don't map to a traditional CVE. But the core discipline hasn't changed: the same lifecycle of scoping, scanning, prioritizing, and remediating still applies, human judgment still drives prioritization, and accountability still sits with the people who deployed the agent, not the agent itself.

Sep 9, 2026