SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Expressions & POVs
Introduce Custom Scripting for your Patching Workflow Using SanerNow

Introduce Custom Scripting for your Patching Workflow Using SanerNow

Custom scripting in patching workflow helps organizations to back up the data from getting lost or can be used to upload the already backed data. Few organizations create a complete patch management process using scripts to help maintain the organization’s security posture and cut off the cost of th...

Mar 30, 2023By Chaitra Sree3 min read

Custom scripting in patching workflow helps organizations to back up the data from getting lost or can be used to upload the already backed data. Few organizations create a complete patch management process using scripts to help maintain the organization’s security posture and cut off the cost of third-party tools. Patch Management Software can resolve these issues.Though scripting can be beneficial, it can also come with its own set of challenges. Dive in to learn more about the different types of scripting and the challenges of custom scripting. A good patch management tool can be very helpful in this instance.

Different types of patching scripts

1. Post-Remediation Script:

As the name suggests, these scripts are executed after you complete the patch management process. These are generally used to apply all the data which you have collected. For example, you have backed up all the data from a particular application, say MongoDB; after the patching process, you can design a script that can help you to store all the backed-up data files in case you miss any information.

2. Pre-remediation script:

During certain situations, there are cases where an organization would have lost all the information in the process of patching. To avoid them, you can introduce a pre-remediation script that would help you back up the data even before the patching begins.

Challenges of Custom Scripting

Generally, these challenges occur when you try to execute a whole patch management process using scripting without any tools.

1. Complexity:

Developing scripts for the entire patching process is complicated and time-consuming. Instead of developing scripts for the complete patching process, choose a particular set of tasks. For example, you might not need some assets that are running on certain ports to be patched. Introducing scripts during deployment to prevent this can be significantly effective.

2. Maintenance:

Patching workflow changes when new patch management process need immediate attention or if you have encountered a zero-day vulnerability. At that time, custom scripting needs to be updated, and it is necessary for IT admins to always remain up-to-date with the latest patching trends.

3. Security:

Custom scripts may introduce security risks if they are not properly executed. It might introduce vulnerabilities into your patching process.

How does Custom Scripting Work in SanerNow?

1: Select Patch Management (PM) from the menu.

2: Click on the missing patches section. Where you will have a list of available patches for deployment.

3: Choose an application you need to patch and click on the apply patches; you will be prompt with the below window.

Step 4: Fill in all the information according to your preference, and in order to deploy scripts click on the remediation scripts option. Here, you will be able to deploy .bat, .sh, .deb, .pkg, and more.

After uploading the script, click Apply on patches, and the patches are ready for deployment.

Custom scripting is easier using SanerNow Patch Management. It is completely automatic and supports patching for all major OSs and 450+ third-party applications. If you have not tried SanerNow yet, opt for its 30-day free trial or book a demo.

Featured Posts

Open The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective
The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

Point of View

The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

No single named standard makes a vulnerability assessment framework effective. This piece covers NIST, ISO, and CIS Controls, then breaks down what actually separates a working framework from a checklist, coverage, risk based prioritization, cadence, ownership, and a feedback loop.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated
Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

Point of View

Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

A vulnerability alone doesn't tell the whole risk story. This piece breaks down how a threat and vulnerability assessment pairs technical weaknesses with real attacker context, walks through the six step process, and covers frameworks like NIST 800-30 and ISO 27005.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For
Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Point of View

Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Choosing a vulnerability assessment provider means asking about actual coverage, scan frequency, and whether findings come with real prioritization or just a CVSS dump. This piece breaks down what strong vulnerability assessment services include, red flags to avoid, and questions to ask before signing.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not
Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Point of View

Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Agentic AI is expanding what a vulnerability assessment needs to cover, autonomous agents bring their own credentials, tool access, and memory, adding a genuinely new asset class alongside servers and endpoints. It's also compressing attacker timelines and introducing risk categories like goal hijacking and tool misuse that don't map to a traditional CVE. But the core discipline hasn't changed: the same lifecycle of scoping, scanning, prioritizing, and remediating still applies, human judgment still drives prioritization, and accountability still sits with the people who deployed the agent, not the agent itself.

Sep 9, 2026