SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Expressions & POVs
SecPod Saner 2.1 – Release Notes

SecPod Saner 2.1 – Release Notes

SecPod Saner 2.1 provides exciting new features and bug fixes. Features include much more robust reporting, automated alerts, threat visualization, and co-branding support for managed service providers. Administrators have a refurbished dashboard, which is fast and convenient. Quick links on the das...

May 30, 2016By Preeti Subramanian3 min read

SecPod Saner 2.1 provides exciting new features and bug fixes. Features include much more robust reporting, automated alerts, threat visualization, and co-branding support for managed service providers. Administrators have a refurbished dashboard, which is fast and convenient. Quick links on the dashboard help search deeper into endpoint data. Remediation based on rules delineates the status of remediation for all applicable devices. Default reports with a backup feature provide detailed security posture of end-points. Backed-up reports can be sent as emails and they serve as a trending history of incidents that have occurred in an organization. Alerts now notify administrators of new vulnerabilities, compliance deviations, or threats as they are detected.

Glimpse of SecPod Saner 2.1
Glimpse of SecPod Saner 2.1

What’s New in Release?

  1. Remediation support for ‘ALL’ software assets. This ensures that all software assets currently present or installed henceforward will be automatically remediated. This feature minimizes the need for constant monitoring.
  2. Threat Visualization and Statistics added to Dashboard.
  3. Introduction of default queries for Administrators, such as Antivirus information, unwanted programs, System User Access Control(UAC) information, Microsoft firewall disabled status, Bit locker protection disabled status, Data Execution Prevention (DEP) disabled status, etc.
  4. Co-branding support – a feature to allow managed service providers and clients to co-brand Saner with their company logo.
  5. Creation of remediation rules and jobs for software assets regardless of their vulnerability status. This ensures remediation of software assets that befit a vulnerable or non-compliant status at a later point of time.
  6. Refurbished default reports – Devices and Groups, Software Assets, Vulnerabilities, Compliance and Benchmark, Threat Intelligence, Patch and Executive summary.
  7. Support to e-mail reports and backup reports at any time of any day.
  8. Export reports in PDF format.
  9. Introduction of Alerts based on Vulnerabilities and severity, Compliance issues, Threats and Queries. Alerts can be received and managed by respective departments through e-mail.
  10. Introduction of Remediation Rule status for monitoring all devices. This ensures greater visibility into the remediation process.
  11. Code signing of Saner installers for Microsoft Windows operating system. This ensures the authenticity of the installers.
  12. Optimization of client management for Managed Service Providers.
  13. Support to handle remediation that requires multiple reboot and other special cases.
  14. Groups and Device Management – showing/hiding groups based on device count, device discovery enhancement, etc.
  15. Support to remediate Microsoft operating systems using KB (Microsoft Knowledge Base) identifiers.
  16. Revised overall installation, deployment and usability of the product.
  17. Remediation support for Mac El Capitan operating system.
  18. Other bug fixes and usability issues.

In summary, Saner SecPod 2.1 provides exciting new capabilities and improved usability for securing and protecting enterprise endpoints.

Contact us at [email protected] for a demonstration of this product.

– Preeti Subramanian(spreeti[{at}]secpod.com), works as Software Architect at SecPod Technologies

Featured Posts

Open The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective
The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

Point of View

The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

No single named standard makes a vulnerability assessment framework effective. This piece covers NIST, ISO, and CIS Controls, then breaks down what actually separates a working framework from a checklist, coverage, risk based prioritization, cadence, ownership, and a feedback loop.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated
Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

Point of View

Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

A vulnerability alone doesn't tell the whole risk story. This piece breaks down how a threat and vulnerability assessment pairs technical weaknesses with real attacker context, walks through the six step process, and covers frameworks like NIST 800-30 and ISO 27005.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For
Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Point of View

Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Choosing a vulnerability assessment provider means asking about actual coverage, scan frequency, and whether findings come with real prioritization or just a CVSS dump. This piece breaks down what strong vulnerability assessment services include, red flags to avoid, and questions to ask before signing.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not
Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Point of View

Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Agentic AI is expanding what a vulnerability assessment needs to cover, autonomous agents bring their own credentials, tool access, and memory, adding a genuinely new asset class alongside servers and endpoints. It's also compressing attacker timelines and introducing risk categories like goal hijacking and tool misuse that don't map to a traditional CVE. But the core discipline hasn't changed: the same lifecycle of scoping, scanning, prioritizing, and remediating still applies, human judgment still drives prioritization, and accountability still sits with the people who deployed the agent, not the agent itself.

Sep 9, 2026