SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Expressions & POVs
SanerNow Architecture Series Part-1: Talk to Any Device, and Respond to Any Device in Real-time

SanerNow Architecture Series Part-1: Talk to Any Device, and Respond to Any Device in Real-time

“The perfect kind of architecture decision is the one which never has to be made” – Robert C. Martin.

Nov 24, 2022By Preeti Subramanian3 min read

“The perfect kind of architecture decision is the one which never has to be made” – Robert C. Martin.

While building the SecPod architecture, our prime intent was to support the transfer and storage of enormous data points.  

An account in SanerNow contains a collection of devices – segregated into groups based on device characteristics. This trait of the SanerNow Server helps administrators to take collective actions. SanerNow starts with discovering devices in the organization’s network and installing agents on these devices using one of the many deployment options available.

The agents are connected to the server and communicate in real-time using a web socket over HTTPS. An alternative communication between agents and the SanerNow server using a polling mechanism is also available. This configuration ensures that no outbound port other than 443 is utilized for communicating with the server. In an organization, 443 is often an allowed outbound port; hence security administrators can be assured that no extra port is open or needs approval.

The communication from the SanerNow server is digitally signed and verified by the agent on the endpoints to prevent man-in-the-middle attacks. Similarly, the agent authenticates with the server using a SAML key unique to every agent; this helps the SanerNow server uniquely identify agents and send detection and response scripts applicable to the devices. The SanerNow Agent authentication sequence is depicted below,

100+ pre-built detection scripts help discover interesting facts about the device. Some of the examples are the presence of potentially unwanted programs, sensitive data stored as plain text, a system up-time of more than seven days, diminishing disk space, security and non-security patches to be installed, installed applications with an unknown publisher, numerous open ports, BitLocker status, gatekeeper settings, etc.

On discovering such security concerns, you can take timely actions such as block/uninstall unwanted applications, delete a file, encrypt the disk, reboot devices, system clean-up, install patches to prevent attacks, deploy trusted software, stop a process, set BitLocker and gatekeeper settings, and ensure proper DEP and Firewall configuration on a device. A security patch information transfer is depicted below,

Along with SanerNow’s robust CVE (Common Vulnerability Enumeration), SVE (SecPod Vulnerability Enumeration), and MVE (Malware Vulnerability Enumeration) based vulnerability prioritization, mitigation, and compliance with Patching capabilities, the ability to talk to a device and respond to security concerns in real-time provides advanced vulnerability management capabilities to your organization. With the upcoming addition of new products in the roadmap, SanerNow architecture does not undergo major changes, thus offering a stable platform for many value-added features for the customers.

Featured Posts

Open The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective
The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

Point of View

The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

No single named standard makes a vulnerability assessment framework effective. This piece covers NIST, ISO, and CIS Controls, then breaks down what actually separates a working framework from a checklist, coverage, risk based prioritization, cadence, ownership, and a feedback loop.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated
Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

Point of View

Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

A vulnerability alone doesn't tell the whole risk story. This piece breaks down how a threat and vulnerability assessment pairs technical weaknesses with real attacker context, walks through the six step process, and covers frameworks like NIST 800-30 and ISO 27005.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For
Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Point of View

Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Choosing a vulnerability assessment provider means asking about actual coverage, scan frequency, and whether findings come with real prioritization or just a CVSS dump. This piece breaks down what strong vulnerability assessment services include, red flags to avoid, and questions to ask before signing.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not
Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Point of View

Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Agentic AI is expanding what a vulnerability assessment needs to cover, autonomous agents bring their own credentials, tool access, and memory, adding a genuinely new asset class alongside servers and endpoints. It's also compressing attacker timelines and introducing risk categories like goal hijacking and tool misuse that don't map to a traditional CVE. But the core discipline hasn't changed: the same lifecycle of scoping, scanning, prioritizing, and remediating still applies, human judgment still drives prioritization, and accountability still sits with the people who deployed the agent, not the agent itself.

Sep 9, 2026