SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Expressions & POVs
ALERT: Windows 10 Update (KB4532693) Can Eat UP System Data

ALERT: Windows 10 Update (KB4532693) Can Eat UP System Data

Feb 19, 2020By Vidita V Koushik2 min read

Microsoft released updates for Patch Tuesday a week ago. A few users who installed the updates encountered missing files and user profiles on their systems. Further investigation revealed that the culprit was Windows 10 update KB4532693. Microsoft has acknowledged the existence of an issue and is analyzing it.

What happens after installingKB4532693?

Several users have reported that settings, desktop, and Start menu boot in a default state as though a new account was created. Shortcuts pinned to desktop or taskbar were also missing.

The flaw identified was that during the installation of this update, the user gets switched to a temporary profile and the original user profile was backed up with a .000 or .bak extension. Upon completion of the installation, the normal user profile could not be restored due to an issue in this update.

That’s not all, the bug also deletes data from Documents, Downloads, and other user folders. There are reports of users facing boot failures and Blue Screens of Death (BSOD) too.

Affected Products

Windows 10 Systems

What TODO, when data is missing in the windows 10 update kb4532693?
Microsoft has acknowledged the issue and is working on a fix. In the meanwhile, it is suggested to follow these guidelines:

1) Check for the presence of folders with a .bak or .000 in C:\users folder. If any of these folders show the presence of your data, it is suggested verify and to back up the data to an external drive or cloud.2) Restart Windows 10 several times and check if the original profile gets restored.3) In case the profile is not restored to normal with step 2, it is recommended to uninstall the update following the instructions mentioned here.

Featured Posts

Open The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective
The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

Point of View

The Most Effective Vulnerability Assessment Framework What Makes One Effective

No single named standard makes a vulnerability assessment framework effective. This piece covers NIST, ISO, and CIS Controls, then breaks down what actually separates a working framework from a checklist, coverage, risk based prioritization, cadence, ownership, and a feedback loop.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated
Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

Point of View

Threat and Vulnerability Assessment How Risk Actually Gets Calculated

A vulnerability alone doesn't tell the whole risk story. This piece breaks down how a threat and vulnerability assessment pairs technical weaknesses with real attacker context, walks through the six step process, and covers frameworks like NIST 800-30 and ISO 27005.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For
Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Point of View

Vulnerability Assessment Services: What to Look For

Choosing a vulnerability assessment provider means asking about actual coverage, scan frequency, and whether findings come with real prioritization or just a CVSS dump. This piece breaks down what strong vulnerability assessment services include, red flags to avoid, and questions to ask before signing.

Sep 11, 2026

Open Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not
Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Point of View

Agentic AI Vulnerability Assessment What Changes and What Does Not

Agentic AI is expanding what a vulnerability assessment needs to cover, autonomous agents bring their own credentials, tool access, and memory, adding a genuinely new asset class alongside servers and endpoints. It's also compressing attacker timelines and introducing risk categories like goal hijacking and tool misuse that don't map to a traditional CVE. But the core discipline hasn't changed: the same lifecycle of scoping, scanning, prioritizing, and remediating still applies, human judgment still drives prioritization, and accountability still sits with the people who deployed the agent, not the agent itself.

Sep 9, 2026