SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Security Research
Double Free Vulnerability Basics Explained

Double Free Vulnerability Basics Explained

One of the most common memory corruption errors usually found in an application is the “Double Free” error. Double-free vulnerability is caused by freeing the same memory location twice by calling free() on the same allocated memory. However, this vulnerability detection can be simple using a vulner...

Oct 29, 2013By Shashi Kiran3 min read

One of the most common memory corruption errors usually found in an application is the “Double Free” error. Double-free vulnerability is caused by freeing the same memory location twice by calling free() on the same allocated memory. However, this vulnerability detection can be simple using a vulnerability management tool.

Also, once a vulnerability is detected, it must be patched too. Which can be done using a patch management software.

 Below is a sample “Double Free” error code,

char* Y = (char*)malloc(20);

…….

If (X)

{

free(Y);

}

……..

free(Y)

Finding such errors in many files in an application becomes too complex.

How memory is allocated without double-free vulnerability:

Consider an application that requests the OS (Operating System) to allocate some amount of memory. Usually, OS projects to the application as if the requested block of memory is one chunk of memory block, but the memory will be segregated in different places. OS usually maintains 2 pointers for each memory location, 1st pointer will have location details of the previous free memory, and the 2nd pointer will have location details of the next free memory location. When you “free()” memory locations,

free(X)

free(Y)

Consider “A” and “B” points to the two pointers of “X” memory location and “C” and “D” points to the two pointers of “Y” memory location.

A —-> 1st pointer of freed “X” memory block holds the previous random memory location

B —-> 2nd pointer of freed “X” memory block holds “y” freed memory location (“Y” memory location is next to “X” memory location)

C —-> 1st pointer of freed “Y” will hold “X” freed memory location (“X” memory location is previous to “Y” memory location)

D —-> 2nd pointer of freed “Y” will hold the next random memory location

It’s similar to a Doubly-linked list.

Here “A” will be holding the previous free random memory location, “B” will be holding the “Y” memory location, and “C” will be holding the “X” memory location; therefore, “D” will be holding the next free random memory location.

What causes a Double Free error Vulnerability ….???

To trigger a double Free Vulnerability, the same memory location should be freed (“free()”) twice. Have a look at the first sample code, variable “Y” is freed twice

free(Y)     # freed first time

free(Y)     # freed again second time

When the same memory-allocated variable is freed twice, multiple memory location pointers will be pointing to the same freed memory location.

Later, an undesirable condition may lead to memory corruption if new memory is allocated to “Z”.

char* Z = (char*)malloc(20);

How to avoid Double Free Vulnerabilit while coding …?

One of the ways to avoid Double Free errors in the code is by assigning the pointer to null after it’s been freed once.

char* Y = (char*)malloc(20);

…….

If (X)

{

free(Y);

Y = NULL;

}

……..

free(Y) # It’s nothing but free(NULL)

free(NULL) will be a dead code that particularly does nothing.

To detect this kind of memory corruption error, Open-Source tools like Valgrindor GNU Project debugger are very much handy, which additionally helps to analyze code in a better way.

– Shashi Kiran

Featured Posts

Open Operation CameraSwarm: Inside the Toolkit Behind 14,530 Compromised Dahua Cameras
Operation CameraSwarm: Inside the Toolkit Behind 14,530 Compromised Dahua Cameras

CVE Research

Operation CameraSwarm: Inside the Toolkit Behind 14,530 Compromised Dahua Cameras

A single operator compromised 14,530+ Dahua cameras across Ukraine and Russia in 35 days, chaining credential brute-force, a CVE-2021-33044/33045 authentication bypass, and P2P relay abuse to plant a persistent backdoor and harvest transferable admin access.

Aug 21, 2026

Open Critical GitLab Flaw Exposes Public Projects to Deletion — Two CVEs Patched, Including High-Severity CSRF
Critical GitLab Flaw Exposes Public Projects to Deletion — Two CVEs Patched, Including High-Severity CSRF

CVE Research

Critical GitLab Flaw Exposes Public Projects to Deletion — Two CVEs Patched, Including High-Severity CSRF

CVE-2026-19478 is a critical code injection vulnerability in GitLab CE/EE that allows an unauthenticated attacker to modify or delete public projects and user data by abusing a GraphQL directive. A second high-severity issue, CVE-2026-19650, involves cross-site request forgery in the GraphQL multiplex query handler. This article examines how the critical vulnerability works, the availability of a public proof-of-concept, the potential impact on self-managed instances, the affected versions, and the security updates released to remediate both issues.

Aug 19, 2026

Open No Password Needed: macOS Screen Sharing Flaw (CVE-2026-65400) Used to Deploy Monero Miners
No Password Needed: macOS Screen Sharing Flaw (CVE-2026-65400) Used to Deploy Monero Miners

CVE Research

No Password Needed: macOS Screen Sharing Flaw (CVE-2026-65400) Used to Deploy Monero Miners

Aug 19, 2026

Open Evooo1Bot: Mirai-Based Linux Botnet Turns Edge Devices Into SOCKS5 Proxies
Evooo1Bot: Mirai-Based Linux Botnet Turns Edge Devices Into SOCKS5 Proxies

CVE Research

Evooo1Bot: Mirai-Based Linux Botnet Turns Edge Devices Into SOCKS5 Proxies

Aug 19, 2026

Double Free Vulnerability Basics Explained | SecPod