SecPod

Learn Search

Search across all Learn content

← Back to Security Research
Double Free Vulnerability Basics Explained

Double Free Vulnerability Basics Explained

One of the most common memory corruption errors usually found in an application is the “Double Free” error. Double-free vulnerability is caused by freeing the same memory location twice by calling free() on the same allocated memory. However, this vulnerability detection can be simple using a vulner...

Oct 29, 2013By Shashi Kiran3 min read

One of the most common memory corruption errors usually found in an application is the “Double Free” error. Double-free vulnerability is caused by freeing the same memory location twice by calling free() on the same allocated memory. However, this vulnerability detection can be simple using a vulnerability management tool.

Also, once a vulnerability is detected, it must be patched too. Which can be done using a patch management software.

 Below is a sample “Double Free” error code,

char* Y = (char*)malloc(20);

…….

If (X)

{

free(Y);

}

……..

free(Y)

Finding such errors in many files in an application becomes too complex.

How memory is allocated without double-free vulnerability:

Consider an application that requests the OS (Operating System) to allocate some amount of memory. Usually, OS projects to the application as if the requested block of memory is one chunk of memory block, but the memory will be segregated in different places. OS usually maintains 2 pointers for each memory location, 1st pointer will have location details of the previous free memory, and the 2nd pointer will have location details of the next free memory location. When you “free()” memory locations,

free(X)

free(Y)

Consider “A” and “B” points to the two pointers of “X” memory location and “C” and “D” points to the two pointers of “Y” memory location.

A —-> 1st pointer of freed “X” memory block holds the previous random memory location

B —-> 2nd pointer of freed “X” memory block holds “y” freed memory location (“Y” memory location is next to “X” memory location)

C —-> 1st pointer of freed “Y” will hold “X” freed memory location (“X” memory location is previous to “Y” memory location)

D —-> 2nd pointer of freed “Y” will hold the next random memory location

It’s similar to a Doubly-linked list.

Here “A” will be holding the previous free random memory location, “B” will be holding the “Y” memory location, and “C” will be holding the “X” memory location; therefore, “D” will be holding the next free random memory location.

What causes a Double Free error Vulnerability ….???

To trigger a double Free Vulnerability, the same memory location should be freed (“free()”) twice. Have a look at the first sample code, variable “Y” is freed twice

free(Y)     # freed first time

free(Y)     # freed again second time

When the same memory-allocated variable is freed twice, multiple memory location pointers will be pointing to the same freed memory location.

Later, an undesirable condition may lead to memory corruption if new memory is allocated to “Z”.

char* Z = (char*)malloc(20);

How to avoid Double Free Vulnerabilit while coding …?

One of the ways to avoid Double Free errors in the code is by assigning the pointer to null after it’s been freed once.

char* Y = (char*)malloc(20);

…….

If (X)

{

free(Y);

Y = NULL;

}

……..

free(Y) # It’s nothing but free(NULL)

free(NULL) will be a dead code that particularly does nothing.

To detect this kind of memory corruption error, Open-Source tools like Valgrindor GNU Project debugger are very much handy, which additionally helps to analyze code in a better way.

– Shashi Kiran

Featured Posts

Open WHIPSHOT and SLAPSHOT: Citrix NetScaler Zero-Days Exploited to Plant Root Web Shells and Internal Tunnels
WHIPSHOT and SLAPSHOT: Citrix NetScaler Zero-Days Exploited to Plant Root Web Shells and Internal Tunnels

CVE Research

WHIPSHOT and SLAPSHOT: Citrix NetScaler Zero-Days Exploited to Plant Root Web Shells and Internal Tunnels

Oct 1, 2026

Open OpenSSL’s DTLS State Handling Error Opens the Door to Heap Data Exposure
OpenSSL’s DTLS State Handling Error Opens the Door to Heap Data Exposure

CVE Research

OpenSSL’s DTLS State Handling Error Opens the Door to Heap Data Exposure

Oct 1, 2026

Open Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: Critical WSO2 and Adobe Flaws Show 1-Day vs. 133-Day Exploitation Window , September 24, 2026 KEV Additions
Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: Critical WSO2 and Adobe Flaws Show 1-Day vs. 133-Day Exploitation Window , September 24, 2026 KEV Additions

CVE Research

Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: Critical WSO2 and Adobe Flaws Show 1-Day vs. 133-Day Exploitation Window , September 24, 2026 KEV Additions

Two critical vulnerabilities added to CISA KEV on September 24, 2026 reveal sharply different exploitation timelines. CVE-2026-71362 saw publicly documented exploitation roughly one day after Adobe's patch release, while CVE-2026-5430 had a 133-day vendor-remediation-to-observed-exploitation interval.

Oct 1, 2026

Open Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: Same-Week KEV Additions, Year-Apart Patch Dates - Linux Kernel, September 18, 2026
Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: Same-Week KEV Additions, Year-Apart Patch Dates - Linux Kernel, September 18, 2026

CVE Research

Patch Analysis & Exploitation Timeline: Same-Week KEV Additions, Year-Apart Patch Dates - Linux Kernel, September 18, 2026

Three Linux kernel vulnerabilities entered CISA’s KEV catalog on September 18, 2026, although their Linux 6.12 fixes were available 91–386 days earlier. This analysis separates patch availability, CVE publication, and known-exploitation status without treating KEV dates as first-attack dates.

Sep 28, 2026